Does Frank Miller’s work on Daredevil and Sin City advance a feminist critique of the ideal of chivalry and our standard hero stories?
I make the case at the Hooded Utilitarian.
Does Frank Miller’s work on Daredevil and Sin City advance a feminist critique of the ideal of chivalry and our standard hero stories?
I make the case at the Hooded Utilitarian.
My two most recent articles both concern issues internal to the anarchist movement.
One is an essay I wrote for Toward Freedom about call-out culture and the effect it has had on organizing in Portland over the past year.
The other is a reflection on leadership, drawing largely from Orwell’s observations of the militia system in revolutionary Spain. Titled “‘Strict Discipline Combined with Social Equality’: Orwell on Leadership in the Spanish Militias,” it appears in the new issue of the Institute for Anarchist Studies‘ journal, Perspectives on Anarchist Theory. (Print only; sorry.)
Two interviews about repression:
First, I interviewed scott crow about his long and often painful association with an agent provocateur. scott witnessed the whole trajectory of Brandon Darby’s strange career — from hippy, to ultra-left militant, to FBI informant, to conservative blogger. What stands out in the story he tells is not the change from one phase to another, but the continuity.
Then, the Brotherwise Dispatch interviewed me about policing, counterinsurgency, and torture. The questions they asked are significantly more sophisticated than most. I just hope my answers are as good.
As a matter of pure coincidence, last month I wrote two very different pieces about good intentions and complicity with evil.
The first, appearing at the Hooded Utilitarian, focuses on Watchmen, Fail-Safe, and Eichmann in Jerusalem. It prompted a response from Ng Suat Tong.
The other essay concerned a local controversy about an FBI trainer who got involved in the civil-disobedience wing of the environmental movement, and somehow got his feelings hurt when people decided he was unwelcome there. You can watch the whole Vahid Brown saga unfold in four parts:
Part One: The Committee Against Political Repression (of which I am a member) published a brief blog post warning people about Brown’s background, with links to the evidentiary documents.
Part Two: Vice accuses CAPR of running a “witch hunt” (and quotes me).
Part Three: Willamette Week tries to have it both ways, saying that activists are right to be “paranoid” but wrong about Brown.
Part Four: I wrote an article for the Seattle Free Press, responding to CAPR’s critics and trying to clarify why it’s a mistake to try to liberalize the FBI by providing them information about the people they’re persecuting.
Of my two articles, I prefer the one about superheroes.